Semmes Law Updates

Semmes offers Law Updates for information-purposes only. Semmes assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or timeliness of any information provided herein. The information may not apply to your unique situation, and is not intended to be used as a basis for any particular course of action or as a substitute for legal advice.

Court Holds Doctor’s Differential Diagnosis Was Improperly Admitted Into Evidence

Supreme Court of Virginia found that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting the expert testimony of a medical doctor’s differential diagnosis into evidence, which was founded upon an assumption that was not established during trial. The court ruled that the medical doctor improperly excluded a possible cause of death when providing his differential diagnosis.

Read More